Whelp...we're going to war it seems; also, Miyazaki.

[doggiedynasty]

My week starts rough and ends rough. I had an ugly 'hate dream", which I didn't want to agree on, and my Sunday started rocky. Now I wonder about myself, and if my dream reflects myself. Or didn't I say before that dreams are mostly negative?

I almost didn't want to go anywhere.

Anyways...back to the title.

America is, apparently. And Britain isn't happy.

I'm sure most of us dislike war for obvious reasons, and either inside or stated openly, we have conflicting reasons over why we should go or why we should not go. First I thought, I agreed with what John Kerry said Liberals liberals, Lib-tards, whiners, dumbass, huah huah huah with "speaking to us [the people of the nation] for an answer" at the start of the announcement. I couldn't hear everything because I was in my car on a short break, listening to the radio.

Did America, and myself as an American, wanted payback for 9/11? Yes. Do I dislike violence? Yes. Do I like self-defense? Yes. Do I like to see innocent children and medical personnel get killed? NO! A one-track mind. Even in Hetalia (Axis Powers ヘタリア), America is portrayed with a "justice loving" stereotype. There's also a ton of other Japanese manga/anime and games; one that sticks out in my memory the most is my bro GALFORD from Samurai Showdown (Samurai Spirits) series! =D

But the question is: Why help Syria? Is America the Superman of the world?
And what would our image be if we did nothing?

Oh BTW,

BTW!

Conservativeintel (CI): A recent history of hate-crime hoaxes

Mr. Freddeso...

What's been annoying me is how THIS article flaunts this as true. No, rather, it's using political party. Or it's provoking the idea that the pseudo-race card and accusation tactics are a tendency to progressive followers, and that they are more prone to using racial hate as a crutch. Or maybe, leftists want racism to succeed. So, if this is so, this image gets put on a political party because of articles like this.

Let's face it, Civil Rights is a progressive kind of movement and well deserved.

Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2013/08/22/meet-the-privileged-obama-supporting-white-kids-who-perpetrated-cruel-oberlin-race-hoax/#ixzz2dfQ1KH9c"

Also, look at the taunting, accusing title of the Daily Caller article: "Meet the privileged Obama-supporting white kids who perpetrated cruel Oberlin race hoax"

Everyone from Obama or Left followers to Right-followers have been called "traitors" and "communists" and "against the people".

You got to look for the actions and words.

Sure, those kids did the wrong thing, defiling a school with slurs and swastika to evoke the Nazi Party. However, Right Wing are out of their minds if they thing they don't do the same thing. When there is bias like this, people with a predisposition to the criticized political party gets national wide dislike. And hatred/dislike/anger can blank out the use of common sense.

Right to Left, Left to Right. If people in power, especially the President, is affiliated with that same party, then there is a split. For youths, this discourages engaging in politics.

Should I be ashamed of being for Democratic ideals (or that is what I'm told anyway)? I don't think I'd be human if I wasn't for a progression in anything.

You could probably say, "Idiot! What about MSNBC and their hatred? They all ignore what radical Leftists do."

It's true that Democratic or left-inclined or progressive inclined contributors of media do bring up race. In recent times, it was definitely shown in Zimmerman case. Because evidence was vague, lying and bringing up race is very easy. Defending oneself when attacked first is a simple logic IF that is what happened.

In speaking and moving, racism is rooted in the way of life. Media may have contributed to it too, which I said in another entry. I don't think it'll ever end, even in the midst of an improved multicultural nation. Racism MAY be an underlying factor to someone's chosen behavior. Outside of the CI article's given example, with racism being very clear in it, race accusations are a bother when its used with a snap of the finger. With certainty.

Just recently, a war veteran in his 80s was killed by Black-American muggers. Commentators expressed disgust. Within those comments, of course, race is mentioned on how there is less media outrage over this and "how Civil Rights leaders would complain if it was the other way around" or "they'd complain if the muggers were arrested". Plus, there is the dislike for the muggers.

But to quote one guy: All this race talk really doesn't matter at the end of the day. Two nasty little punks beat a defenseless old man to death. It's just sad. Comments about slavery are ridiculous and have no bearing..

It's a murder, not a Civil Rights situation.

Racism is race, not party. Back then, the ancestors of the Democrat party were for segregation and slavery. Also, the Nazi Party were not for the Conservatives and were very nationalist; they disliked communism too.

Which reminds me, people need to stop using the word "communism" to denote something they dislike or change of rules. Communism and Marxist doesn't mean "rule infringement".

I am not denying anything. I guess someone has to do it. Right needs to punch the Left radicals and Left needs to the punch the Right radicals. Wouldn't call it "news".

With that said, 50 years ago, MLK made his "I have a dream" speech.

I'm putting up a photo of Kaze Tachinu because:
1.) Airplane!
2.) Hirokoshi Jiro looking cool
3.) It's flat out cool
4.) Miyazaki Hayao's passion and pacifist beliefs
5.) I want to watch it

So Miyazaki is getting criticized for worshiping Hirokoshi as a hero. The movie is a tribute to the warplane engineer, his dream, and his struggle during the Depression and 1930s earthquake. Miyazaki spoke against the Prime Minister and his idea to revise the Renunciation of War of Japan's Constitution. Miyazaki was also against "re-writing the truth" (aka: reading only what we choose to know).

Banning of "Barefoot Gen" in children schools

I can't say anymore until I watch the movie. But, since Hiro was willingly building warplanes responsible for the historical incidents that make Japanese and Koreans alike sensitive, what is Miyazaki's view? What am I missing? Is it just Hiro's desire? No matter what his Zero fighter did?

Vehicles are flexible and don't have to be built as weapons. Even though, I TOO think that fighter planes are pretty darn cool. They maximum the effectiveness of aerodynamics, and look pretty sexy while flying.

Also, Miyazaki is retiring? Naaaaah, you wouldn't do that would you?

Which reminds me, I am writing a fictional story about a pilot who loves flying. He graduated from Officer's training and eventually became a fighter pilot, because he was inspired to love fighter planes. After a match against a rival, he mention that non-simulated air combat will be the test he needs to further pursing his flying craft. Before that, he questioned why America went to war and what did it mean to "be an American"?